jews mocking jpg
(184.92 KB, 579x256)
Rule 5 : No insulting most religions. Respectful biblical discussion is allowed, but no attacks on faiths. The exceptions are: Judaism, Satanism and Scientology.
After one came here to violate that board rule and insult Christianity with the "Jewsus" accusation like the gay black porn spammer of years ago used to, I deleted their post. I believe it's time to address the accusation with a long string of logic from point A to point B. In other words, I have a autism-adjacent grasp of historical relevance, so don't even think you can plant the seed of division to pit historically Christian National Socialists against Christianity.
This religion hinges on the Immaculate Conception. That is, Mary's virgin birth of Jesus Christ. The virgin birth is literal truth in the doctrine we're testing. That severs the patrilineal iron wall completely. No biological Jewish father means no Davidic tribal blood, no House of Judah inheritance, no messianic kingship under Second Temple rules. Jesus's existence was entirely spiritual, not to follow in Jewish demands. The Gospel genealogies through Joseph attempt to bridge a biological gap that can't be bridged, because Joseph was not the biological father.
That leaves only Mary.
Mary was Galilean, from "Galilee of the Gentiles". Jews called them "Galil ha-goyim", the land of the Ethnē, the foreigners. 1 Maccabees calls it "all Galilee of the allophylōn," using the same hostile term reserved for Philistines and outsiders. Josephus, the Judean aristocrat writing for Romans, describes the Galileans as a crowd of barbarians, using allophylōn and treating them as a distinct breed, clannish, seditious against Judeans, different in temperament and loyalty from Judeans. Ethnographic classification of outsiders who share the religion but not the blood.
Gaulanitis, the Golan, the exact frontier zone, was the Seleucid buffer. Seleucid kings settled Galatian mercenaries on precisely those frontiers as military colonists. Celtic warriors from the same stock became the Galatians of Anatolia. They took local Iturean and Aramean wives. Their descendants formed a hybrid military-caste stock. The name Gaulanitis itself echoes Galatia/Gaul. The Romans heard it and used it because it fit the people they found there. The Hebrew "Galil" and the Celtic "Gal-" converged in a region the Jewish sources themselves marked as foreign.
Hasmonean forced conversions and resettlement made them religious Jews only when forced to convert, but conversion does not erase blood or the Judean suspicion. They became Gerim, strangers who keep the Law but carry the older northern tribal identity. The blatant Talmudic insults of Jesus, the distinct accent, the "barbarian" label from Josephus, all point to the same thing: Galileans were religious Jews, but ethnically the descendants of the mixed Ethnē of the north, with that Galatian mercenary trace in the soil of Gaulanitis.
Divine, non-corporeal father = zero Jewish paternal tribe.
Galilean mother from the land of the Ethnē, the barbarian-classified, Gaulanitis-named frontier with its absorbed Galatian element = maternal lineage from the northern stock the Judeans called foreigners.
Jesus of Nazareth was therefore a religious reformer operating inside a Jewish framework, but ethnically and tribally, by the strict patrilineal standards of his time and the ethnographic record, he was not a Jew. He was a Galilean, the child of the Barbarians of the North, carrying the blood of the Galatae who left their trace in the Gentiles' circle.
That's the inescapable logic. Now leave OP to posting their verses. OP is restricted by the same not praising Jews rules as you all are. There are two ways, on an anonymous imageboard, of attempting to determine who is Jewish. One is insulting Hitler. That is a magnet for them. They cannot resist. The second is their noted hatred of Christianity. I'm here to prevent Jews from infesting this board. Period.