a random ausneets banner

/ausneets/ - AusNEETs

The bored four NEETs


New Reply on thread #1032125
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

Index | Catalog | Banners | Logs
Posting mode: Reply [Return]


thumbnail of 1578678572489.jpg
thumbnail of 1578678572489.jpg
1578678572489 jpg
(264.12 KB, 400x560)
Cruisey gets his mongs to steal stuff for him.
He waits in the car playing games on his phone. He doesn't even look up until they are back in the car with the goods.
Then he drives off like butter wouldn't melt in his mouth.








 >>/1032161/
There are/have been NGOs that provide cheap cars to those that qualify. Anyone getting Cenno could ease up on the legal drugs for a month or so to afford a car anyway. Getting a drivers' licence is fucking impossible, though, as NDIS providers and Commercial Driving 'Schools' have trashed the old schemes like CES and Rotary had going.



The flaw I see with the solar panel on the van roof is that it means you always have to park your van in full sun.
That must be a problem when the temp gets into the thirties. Like an oven in there.

 >>/1032170/
But even with free Neetvans, the majority of random homeless people wouldn't really get how to live in one. Look at the campgrounds with BCF $600 Swags everywhere instead of $100 2P tents that're actually more comfy. Everyone would want a power generator to power their mains appliances because they 'can't' cook on gas, as well.


 >>/1032173/
The breeze through the van is good and there's no heat build-up. When parked in a city to go shopping it hits 40C, though. A common mod is to put a powered ventilation fan on the roof, and there's also vans with sliding side windows.
























































































 >>/1032260/
> Brisbane beat Hawthorn 131–122, with a crucial holding-the-ball decision in the final moments before Brisbane kicked the decisive goals. That late umpiring decision is the likely reason for “controversial ending.” 
So the message basically means: >“That was a fantastic match, but the way it finished will probably cause debate because of the umpiring decision.”
Slop is how I follow it




 >>/1032266/
 >>/1032267/
Doesn't make sense.
At 122-125 On the first video blonde long mulletguy launches an attack and passes to blonde short mulletguy. Then referee whistles in. Then blonde short mulletguy kicks a goal, 122-131.
Why ref called it?
But then apparently this isn't controversial, but a previous action at 122-119? This resulted a goal for the Lions apparently.





































Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


141 replies | 24 file
New Reply on thread #1032125
Max 20 files0 B total