>>/183348/,  >>/183349/,  >>/183350/,  >>/183351/,  >>/183352/,  >>/183353/,  >>/183354/,  >>/183355/,  >>/183356/,  >>/183357/
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - I owe @LauraLoomer a partial retraction. The Fox story appears to have been planted specifically to cause this fight, and I walked right into it. My broader point about OSINT vs. insider-scoop models stand, but I shouldn't have made it on a story that turned out to be bait.
I have no loyalty to Tulsi's office or Francescon, and I stand by that denial completely. But I also recognize that tonight wasn't the night to re-litigate the epistemology of political intelligence. Someone is trying to fracture the right over the taking of those documents. Giving them this fight is not useful.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2054780467111665930

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - This was reported through Fox News. I know for a fact that they have very, very rigorous rules for reporting.
Conversation
Mark Coester For U.S. House @CMarkCoester
When you fall for click bait, it lowers credibility.
One fake Whistle blower who had already given that same COVID testimony previously.  Gets called in and drops a crumb.  America explodes with everyone fussing.
The game is to discredit Gabbard and Radcliffe.  48 hour rule.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2054773685874249888

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Dark thought.
Conversation
General Mike Flynn @GenFlynn
This agency “response” indicates that Ratcliffe is not in control.
Conversation
Hans Mahncke @HansMahncke
Leaving everything else aside, how is this even a real post in May 2026 under a President Trump administration? These people sound as rogue as ever, which was already obvious when they tried to dismiss the Russiagate hoax as mere “tradecraft errors,” forcing Tulsi Gabbard to step in and publicly call them out.
I like John Ratcliffe. He did important work on both Russiagate and Covid origins in the past. But a CIA director who allows this kind of totally inverted garbage to be pushed out under his watch does not appear to have control.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2054772262684008628

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - What if intensifying existing in-fights were the point? 🤷 @Schwalm5132 would love your take.
Quote
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican
This raises a lot of questions about the motives of whoever leaked the original raid to Fox News.
Quote
Breanna Morello @BreannaMorello
UPDATE DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s team is DENYING that the CIA raided their office.
“This is false - the CIA did not raid the DNI’s office,” says @DNIspox
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2054768405933412759

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - This raises a lot of questions about the motives of whoever leaked the original raid to Fox News.
Quote
Breanna Morello @BreannaMorello
UPDATE DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s team is DENYING that the CIA raided their office.
“This is false - the CIA did not raid the DNI’s office,” says @DNIspox
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2054766959716454559

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Yep, same here. Mutual respect. Happy to RT your work.
Quote
Fifty nine @Fiftynine318535
Sam, you're following @DataRepublican aren't you?  She can totally hook you up and save you a ton of time.
Quote
Sam E. Antar @SamAntar
I love and respect her work. She’s been an inspiration to me. But I prefer acting alone and keeping other people out of my enemies crosshairs.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2054766181652033693

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - If it’s the ODNI responding, that complicates everything.
Quote
Erikaaa @ErikaC47
ODNI says false. 🤷🏻‍♀️
Quote
Olivia Coleman @DNIspox
This is false - the CIA did not raid the DNI’s office.
Quote
Jesse Watters @JesseBWatters
Video: BREAKING: THE CIA JUST RAIDED TULSI GABBARD’S OFFICE… HOLY SMOKES!
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2054766022998335712
 11