>>/182919/,  >>/182920/,  >>/182921/,  >>/182922/,  >>/182923/,  >>/182924/
00:40 Legal Theory Behind “Grand Conspiracy” Against President Trump
01:30 Former CIA Director Brennan Investigation
02:15 Florida Courts Are the Battleground
02:52 What is "Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law"
04:30 Brennan Alleged “Abuse of Authority” 2017 Intelligence Report About Russia
04:55 Former NSA Director Mike Rogers Critical Witness
05:30 DOJ Can Get Around Statute of Limitations
06:15 Did Brennan’s TV Appearances, Book “Restart the Clock” on Statute of Limitations?
07:45 Brennan Claims Investigation is Politically Motivated
09:00 Attorney General Bondi vs Acting Attorney General Blanche
09:40 Comey “8647 Seashell” Indictment Can Survive First Amendment Challenge
11:32 Comey “Forfeiture of Assets”
13:28 Superseding Indictment Comey Case
14:05 Columbia Law School Professor Was Liaison to Media
15:14 FBI Director Patel Declassified FBI Media Leaks Probe Codenamed “Arctic Haze”
16:00 Potential False Statements to Investigators
16:50 Comey Memos: Trump/Russia Collusion Investigations
18:20 Was Comey the Source of Classified Leak?
18:45 President Obama Not Off The Hook
20:00 Defendants Will Try to Run Out the Clock
21:50 Legitimate Indictments vs. Moral Condemnation
23:10 White House Briefing: Taking the New Media Seat
23:55 Breaking the Legacy Media Hold on Washington
https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/2052541264009052417

Catherine Herridge @CHerridge - Video: EXCLUSIVE: Veteran DOJ Official Explains 18 USC 242(Deprivation Of Civil Rights Under Color of Law) As A Potential Key Statute In The Grand Conspiracy Case
“It takes willful, intentional conduct by someone that’s designed to take away constitutionally protected rights of another person… You could couch that in terms of President Trump’s to kind of run unimposed or not face scurrilous impeachments, or you could view it as the voters as a victim of the conduct… Maybe it’s the right to a fair election.”
@thelatmg @latimesstudios_  
Quote:
Catherine Herridge @CHerridge 
Video: BREAKING: Justice Department Veteran Reveals President Obama Prosecution Possible in ‘Grand Conspiracy’ Case Against President Trump; Says James Comey’s “8647” Indictment Will Likely Survive First Amendment Challenges
This week on Straight to the Point, I sat down with former DOJ official and longtime federal prosecutor Jim Trusty for a wide-ranging interview on the expanding investigations into Obama-era intelligence and law enforcement officials dubbed “The Grand Conspiracy."
Asked if the cases were viable, Trusty identified 18 USC 242 as the leading statute for prosecutions in the alleged ‘grand conspiracy’ and discusses how former CIA Director John Brennan’s TV appearances and recently published book may have reset the clock on the statute of limitations. Trusty also addressed James Comey's recent “8647” threat indictment and possible superseding false statements charges.
@thelatmg @latimesstudios_
Responding to the NC indictment, former FBI Director Comey said he is still innocent, not afraid, and believes in the independent judiciary.
John Brennan has called the investigation politically motivated.
Columbia Law School Professor Daniel Richman has not responded to repeated requests for comment.
00:40 Legal Theory Behind “Grand Conspiracy” Against President Trump
01:30 Former CIA Director Brennan Investigation
02:15 Florida Courts Are the Battleground
02:52 What is "Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law"
04:30 Brennan Alleged “Abuse of Authority” 2017 Intelligence Report About Russia
04:55 Former NSA Director Mike Rogers Critical Witness
05:30 DOJ Can Get Around Statute of Limitations
06:15 Did Brennan’s TV Appearances, Book “Restart the Clock” on Statute of Limitations?
07:45 Brennan Claims Investigation is Politically Motivated
09:00 Attorney General Bondi vs Acting Attorney General Blanche
 7