>>/181118/, >>/181119/, >>/181120/, >>/181120/, >>/181122/, >>/181123/, >>/181124/, >>/181125/, >>/181126/
Chris LaCivita @ChrisLaCivita - Here’s a classic example of a piece of shit that sells access he doesn’t have - then turns around and takes a dump on those people - and for the record..he was not a senior advisor on the campaign - I would know
Quote:
Dasha Burns @DashaBurns
NEW: A growing number of White House allies are resigned to losing the House and fear that the Senate is also in play.
“Everything is made more difficult by the nonsense coming out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue,” a Republican operative close to the White House told me.
“The road to victory runs through a consistent economic message,” said Bryan Lanza, a senior adviser to Trump’s 2024 campaign. “Unfortunately, President Trump ignores the road map.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/15/republicans-white-house-nonsense-midterms-00874332
https://x.com/ChrisLaCivita/status/2044621488586691014
Chris Martz @ChrisMartzWX - I am a degreed meteorologist.
You, on the other hand, are the chair of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin.
I live and breathe the weather for a living, you play politics.
If anyone is getting an education here, it will be you.
The hail report chart you posted is from the Wisconsin State Climatology Office at UW-Madison.
On that website, they state that the NWS upped the criteria of “severe hail” from 0.75 inch to 1.0 inch in January 2010, not the other way around like you claim. So, I was correct in plotting the 1-inch data as well as 1.50” for good measure.
Your reading comprehension skills suck horse dick, so I strongly recommend that you drive on down to LensCrafters and schedule an eye doctor appointment as soon as possible.
Severe weather data, particularly hail reports, prior to the 2000s are not very reliable because the WSR-88D radar was not implemented until the early 1990s. The increase in rural population and increased use of cameras has resulted in the observed increase in spotter reports since the 1950s, which the website you pulled that chart from also states.
Here is more reading for you to do:
Over the 25-year period for which we have RELIABLE spotter and radar data for Wisconsin, there has been no detectable increase in severe hail reports of 1.0” or 1.50” in diameter.
You would be wise at this point to shut up, admit you were wrong, and show some humility here because you are not an expert on atmospheric science.
Quote:
Devin Remiker @devinremikerwi
Glad I can educate you on this topic, seems like you really need the help.
Your deceptive chart counts the raw # of reports, which includes multiple reports from the same events and doesn’t disprove the point.
Below more accurately shows the increase large hail events over time in WI.
Btw— the definition of severe hail was updated by NWS in 2010 to >=.75in, so your thresholds are dumb too.
https://x.com/ChrisMartzWX/status/2044639902411661549
Christian Memes and Puns @ChristianPunsOG - Video: Is this father in the right?
https://x.com/ChristianPunsOG/status/2044977737836700151
Christian Memes and Puns @ChristianPunsOG - Video: Import Reminder.
https://x.com/ChristianPunsOG/status/2044965306322264334
Christian Tweets @JesusSavesUs777 - Meme: I paid it all for you. There's no price I wouldn't pay for you to be In Heaven! - Jesus
https://x.com/JesusSavesUs777/status/2044944185996808340
Christian Tweets @JesusSavesUs777 - Jesus Christ is King!
https://x.com/JesusSavesUs777/status/2044914051407327525
10