>>/180879/,  >>/180880/,  >>/180881/,  >>/180882/,  >>/180883/,  >>/180884/,  >>/180885/,  >>/180886/,  >>/180887/,  >>/180888/,  >>/180889/,  >>/180890/,  >>/180891/,  >>/180892/,  >>/180893/
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - (2/4)
Now, here's where it gets interesting. And here's where I think you may genuinely not know the full picture.
In the above video clip, you say:
"We are in this moment where the depolarization movement I think is beginning to coalesce. I mean, I think you and I are in a position to sort of feel it. Braver Angels, Millennial Action Project, all of the amazing organizations in New Pluralists, National Conversations Project."
You named New Pluralists by name. So let's talk about what New Pluralists actually is.
In 2017, Mark Gerzon, president of the Mediators Foundation, consultant to the United Nations Development Programme, distinguished fellow at the EastWest Institute, organized a private meeting of major political funders at the Rockefeller Brothers Fund's Pocantico Conference Center. Representatives of both the Koch and Soros networks were in the room. The project was co-launched by Stephen Heintz, President of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
Out of that meeting came the New Pluralists.
Today, New Pluralists is a funder collaborative, not a standalone nonprofit. It is fiscally sponsored by Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors. Templeton, Hewlett, Einhorn, Fetzer, Klarman, Lubetzky, and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund are all partners. MacKenzie Scott gave $4 million. The stated goal is $100 million over a decade.
Braver Angels is listed as one of approximately 60 "Field Builders." So is Tim Shriver's Dignity Index. So is Horizons Project. So is David French.
The same foundations that fund the New Pluralists collaborative also fund Braver Angels directly. Templeton gave $1.26 million to Braver Angels. Hewlett gave at least $75,000 plus undisclosed seed funding. They are also governing partners of New Pluralists. The money goes to the funder collaborative AND to the organizations the collaborative funds. It is the same pipeline.
You described this as "a moment where the depolarization movement is beginning to coalesce." New Pluralist's strategic plan describes it as a $100 million coordinated investment in field infrastructure. Both descriptions are accurate. The difference is yours sounds organic. Theirs sounds like what it is.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2044256815714914809

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Video: Hello Mr. Woods, (1/4)
I appreciate you engaging, sincerely. You're one of the few people in this space who actually responded, and your tone was decent. So I want to return the courtesy... and this is my first multi-part Hello.
You wrote: "Is any organized effort that involves people working from across the aisle necessarily a conspiracy?"
No. It isn't. And I haven't called it one. I've called it what it is: a funded, coordinated, strategically managed field.
Let me start with you.
You are the National Ambassador of Braver Angels. Braver Angels pulled in $5,651,273 in 2024, up from $958,681 in 2019... mostly from major foundations.
But your public videos repeatedly frame it as a "grassroots"  or "national citizens" movement.
These two things cannot both be true. A $5.6 million-per-year operation funded predominantly by major foundations is not a grassroots citizens movement. It is a professionally managed nonprofit. There is nothing wrong with that... unless you describe it as something it isn't.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2044256727785451874

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Thanks for the confirmation of your affiliation with New Pluralists <3 I'll respond when I've finished research.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2044213557861228916

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - All you have to do is look at how CA went from red to blue overnight.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2044182101596221899
 16