>>/180124/,  >>/180125/,  >>/180126/,  >>/180127/,  >>/180128/,  >>/180129/,  >>/180130/,  >>/180131/,  >>/180132/
DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Doesn't surprise me. By and far the most #1 foreign country that pops up in my domestic color research is the UK. A key difference there is that the UK has a strong right-wing populist / sovereigntist minority streak, but that streak is applied to protecting UK's interests againt Russia. 
And those interests mean: keep United States money flowing into NATO and keep United States money flowing into Ukraine. Which by extension means weakening the MAGA base and being anti-Trump. 
I suspect, but have no smoking gun, that these UK connections are motivating Candace Owens in her splintering of the MAGA base.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041278254523310089

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - You are not alone. I'd have done the exact same thing.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041276851113341255

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Hey, that's not fair. I wasn't part of Project 2025. Honestly, a little hurt I was too early to make the cut.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041270472000590172

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - You’ve got a point 😅
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041214387579494589

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - I feel bad for him, really. He got boosted because he pushed the institutional narrative. 
Then he dared to have a couple of original thoughts, and all of a sudden G. Elliott Morris dude who thinks that polling should serve "our democracy" stole his thunder.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041181551682076893

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Your entire argument collapses if the underlying data is wrong. And here, it is. When accounts are omitted or mislabeled, any ratios derived from them become meaningless. You're analyzing a distorted sample and presenting it as signal.
This isn't a debate where competing "truths" are weighed until one feels more convincing. If the inputs are flawed, the conclusion is invalid, full stop.
This isn't about you having a different interpretation from Nikita. You have exposed your entire methodology as fraudulent.
Conversation
Nate Silver @NateSilver538
It's not my data.
The source is Cluvio, which is linked to in the article. I'd link to it in this tweet, but ironically, that would kill engagement.
And I know that traffic is hard to count. Especially for a private company. But if you have more accurate data, then publish it.
Quote
Nikita Bier @nikitabier
Replying to @NateSilver538
Data isn’t accurate. Missing half the network.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041180018223481141

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - What a roast
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041173565857202665

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - Here's the rest of my YTD stats in 2026 for comparison, the same date range as Hasan.
 No botting that I know of.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041172549598339438

DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican - 21.1% here.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2041168681799963092
 10