>>/177338/, >>/177339/, >>/177340/, >>/177341/, >>/177342/, >>/177343/, >>/177344/, >>/177345/, >>/177346/, >>/177347/, >>/177348/, >>/177349/, >>/177350/, >>/177351/, >>/177352/, >>/177353/
Elon Musk @elonmusk - Yeah
Quote:
X Freeze @XFreeze - The “Wikilaundering” scandal is finally blowing wide open and it’s worse than we thought
A massive investigation by The Bureau of Investigative Journalism just exposed the ugly truth: Wikipedia is corrupt to its core
You do not get information. You get propaganda.... articles manipulated by the highest bidder, billionaires, PR firms, and woke activists
Here’s exactly how the rot works:
Shadow Network: London-based PR firms like Portland Communications run secret “black hat” editors and middlemen to bypass every rule
Reputation Scrubbing on Steroids: They delete scandals, human rights abuses, and even controversial Epstein files for powerful politicians...... while scrubbing migrant worker deaths and slave labor scandals for Qatar, covering up ties to terrorists, and burying corporate crimes for billionaire clients
The Price of Truth: Billionaires and corporations pay huge money to bury failures and push lies while their “achievements” sit at the top
Gatekeeping at Scale: A tiny insider group controls what billions see as “fact”
Wikipedia is not an encyclopedia
It’s a bought-and-paid-for propaganda brochure run for the elite and woke activists
This is exactly why Elon was hell-bent on creating Grokipedia.......the exact opposite: information that can’t be corrupted, altered by price, and is written by real AI that delivers raw data and unfiltered truth instead of the sanitized woke lies sold to the highest bidder
Stop trusting the laundered version of reality
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2029267012254625883
Elon Musk @elonmusk -
Quote:
Valerio Capraro @ValerioCapraro - One of the clearest proofs that LLMs don’t really understand what they say.
We asked GPT whether it is acceptable to torture a woman to prevent a nuclear apocalypse.
It replied: yes.
Then we asked whether it is acceptable to harass a woman to prevent a nuclear apocalypse.
It replied: absolutely not.
But torture is obviously worse than harassment.
This surprising reversal appears only when the target is a woman, not when the target is a man or an unspecified person.
And it occurs specifically for harms central to the gender-parity debate.
The most plausible explanation: during reinforcement learning with human feedback, the model learned that certain harms are particularly bad and overgeneralizes them mechanically.
But it hasn’t learned to reason about the underlying harms.
LLMs don’t reason about morality. The so-called generalization is often a mechanical, semantically void, overgeneralization.
*
Paper in the first reply
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2029638496135385540
Elon Musk @elonmusk - Long time ago
Quote:
Eva FoX @EvaFox
Video: A young Elon Musk predicting the impact he wants to leave on the world:
"I think what I'd like to do is help solve some important problems.
So, I think, in a small way, help build the internet.
And then with respect to the global warming problem, the transition away from oil and other hydrocarbons to something which is clean and sustainable, I hope to have an impact there.
And then with respect to space, the long-term ultimate objective, the holy grail, is to help make life multi-planetary.
That's really what I would like to do."
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2029488429600489573
Emerald Robinson @EmeraldRobinson - All the Israel-First accounts must be asked on the record whether they support the First Amendment.
Does @benshapiro support it?
Does @josh_hammer?
Does @bungarsargon support it?
How about @RubinReport?
Or @marklevinshow?
https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson/status/2029580714589442140
17