>>/176305/, >>/176306/, >>/176307/, >>/176308/, >>/176309/, >>/176310/, >>/176311/, >>/176312/, >>/176313/, >>/176314/, >>/176315/, >>/176316/, >>/176317/, >>/176318/, >>/176319/, >>/176320/, >>/176321/, >>/176322/, >>/176323/, >>/176324/, >>/176325/, >>/176326/, >>/176327/, >>/176328/, >>/176329/, >>/176330/, >>/176331/, >>/176332/, >>/176333/, >>/176334/, >>/176335/, >>/176336/, >>/176337/, >>/176338/, >>/176339/, >>/176340/, >>/176341/, >>/176342/, >>/176343/, >>/176344/, >>/176345/, >>/176346/, >>/176347/, >>/176348/, >>/176349/, >>/176350/, >>/176351/, >>/176352/, >>/176353/, >>/176354/, >>/176355/, >>/176356/, >>/176357/, >>/176358/, >>/176359/, >>/176360/, >>/176361/, >>/176362/, >>/176363/, >>/176364/, >>/176365/, >>/176366/, >>/176367/, >>/176368/, >>/176369/, >>/176370/, >>/176371/, >>/176372/, >>/176373/, >>/176374/, >>/176375/, >>/176376/, >>/176377/, >>/176378/, >>/176379/, >>/176380/, >>/176381/, >>/176382/, >>/176383/, >>/176384/, >>/176385/, >>/176386/, >>/176387/, >>/176388/, >>/176389/, >>/176390/, >>/176391/, >>/176392/
President Trump Delivers Remarks, Feb. 20, 2026 - The White House
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Hr4ql_ejTns
President Trump Participates in a Working Breakfast with Governors - The White House
https://youtube.com/watch?v=A60a0kjALQs
President Trump Delivers Remarks on the Economy, Feb. 19, 2026 - The White House
https://youtube.com/watch?v=dSvsEvBq84o
President Trump Participates in the Board of Peace Event - The White House
https://youtube.com/watch?v=vaPfxaSIc0w
Inaugural Board of Peace Meeting at the Donald J. Trump Peace Institute - The White House
https://youtube.com/watch?v=GuIkrD1fzLU
President Donald J. Trump Visits Coosa Steel in Georgia - The White House
https://youtube.com/watch?v=dx3NgZ73Gpo
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump - We’re Winning too much, it’s just not fair! President DJT
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116117644453675365
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump - Video: Mark Levine: Some people like to give you a quick opinion about something like this. This is the Supreme Court decision opinion on tariffs.
Here's the problem.
There's opinions within opinions.
It's a mess.
First, there was no need for the court to rule as it did, period.
The majority is not even a majority, except in agreeing to hold that the tariffs were not authorized by Congress in a 1977 law.
Second, the majority is split into two camps.
You've got Roberts, Gorsuch, and Barrett.
And then that camp is split, somewhat, between Gorsuch and Barrett.
Third, the three other justices in the second camp of the majority - the usual leftists - well, they mostly agreed with each other, but went further in attacking the president's tariff authority.
I can assure you they wouldn't have done it with a Biden or Obama.
Number four, this explains why it took so long for the court to issue a ruling.
Because the ruling appears to be a variety of arguments intended to reach a result.
That is, in my view, it was "result-oriented."
A result looking for a constitutional and or legal justification.
Now, fifth, if the Court, as here, is going to issue a ruling that is so destructive of or contrary to the executive's international economic, national security and foreign policy objectives and the President's strategies, the President and We the People, deserve a lot better than the massive mess that these nine lawyers created.
This ruling is more like some committee of lawyers or some law review group of legal students in the law library, each vying to impose his or her own policy preferences on the President while searching for some constitutional and legal justifications to do so.
In fact, this case was not complicated at all.
Although the decision, which is actually an accumulation of arguments within the court, is complicated because of its incoherence.
Six, the court majority wants you to believe that this was a matter of statutory interpretation only, involving one statute passed in 1977, and Congress's power over the purse.
89