>>/176106/, >>/176107/, >>/176108/, >>/176109/, >>/176110/, >>/176111/, >>/176112/, >>/176113/, >>/176114/, >>/176115/, >>/176116/, >>/176117/, >>/176118/, >>/176119/, >>/176120/, >>/176121/, >>/176122/, >>/176123/, >>/176124/, >>/176125/, >>/176126/, >>/176127/, >>/176128/, >>/176129/, >>/176130/, >>/176131/, >>/176132/, >>/176133/, >>/176134/, >>/176135/, >>/176136/, >>/176137/, >>/176138/, >>/176139/, >>/176140/, >>/176141/, >>/176142/, >>/176143/, >>/176144/, >>/176145/, >>/176146/, >>/176147/, >>/176148/, >>/176149/, >>/176150/, >>/176151/, >>/176152/, >>/176153/, >>/176154/, >>/176155/, >>/176156/, >>/176157/, >>/176158/, >>/176159/, >>/176160/, >>/176161/, >>/176162/, >>/176163/, >>/176164/, >>/176165/, >>/176166/, >>/176167/, >>/176168/, >>/176169/, >>/176170/, >>/176171/, >>/176172/, >>/176173/, >>/176174/, >>/176175/, >>/176176/, >>/176177/, >>/176178/, >>/176179/, >>/176180/, >>/176181/, >>/176182/
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump - Video: If these ballots were run through multiple times, as you've alleged, and you said possibly up to 30,000 times - definitely thousands of times - being counted, when we examine the poll book and see who voted and we count those numbers, would they then not line up with the total number of votes coming out of Detroit?
-
The poll book is completely off. Completely off.
-
Off by 30,000?
-
I'd say that poll book is off by over 100,000.
Where are you from?
-
Oh, I'm from Down River. Okay. I'm here because of the 38,000 ballots that arrived here at 3.45 a.m. that are just now sitting over there and getting counted, supposedly. Okay. And that's why I arrived.
-
Okay.
-
To an eye-opening hypocrisy, let me tell you. Something I want you to see, they're taping up the windows. Security's taping up the windows so that people who are challenging... can't see in there....
-
I began observing the process of ballots at several counting boards. I quickly noticed that none - and I mean none - of the names were being scanned from the ballots were in the electronic poll books.
All of the names that were found were found in the supplemental sheets.
We know that the electronic poll books were updated on Sunday, November 1st.
That meant that all of these new ballots had to have been brand new registered voters on Monday, November 2nd, or Tuesday, November 3rd.
I found it very hard to believe that tens of thousands of people had registered in just two short days, so I began writing down the names on the ballots immediately after they were scanned by the computer poll worker.
As soon as I began, I was severely obstructed by five different persons such that I could no longer continue my legal responsibility as a poll challenger.
These five persons comprised of a poll worker, a supervisor, an uncredentialed person, a Democrat challenger, and one of the top leaders of the ABCB.
The details can be found on my affidavit. Does anyone believe that 30 or 40,000 new voters were actually signed up legally in two days?
-
And what have you seen? I've seen ballots that don't belong to anybody. They don't show up in voter registration. There's no name attached to them.
-
And what are they doing with those ballots?
-
I'm challenging them. They're supposed to put them in a box to be evaluated. But then multiple ballots that have several different numbers, one person with different numbers. We have full lists of them. We're writing everything down all day long.
-
So are they improperly filled out and you're looking to disqualify them? -
Yes. If they're improperly filled out, if they have no name, if they don't have a home, or if the person was born in 1921 but registered to vote in 1900, that kind of doesn't make sense.
-
But that's not on the ballot. When you vote, your ballot is just the balls and what you have on there. What are you seeing? Are you seeing people's registration forms?
79