>>/174600/, >>/174601/, >>/174602/, >>/174603/, >>/174604/, >>/174605/, >>/174606/, >>/174607/
Eric Idle @EricIdle - I married one!
Quote
Henry Winkler @hwinkler4real
They were unmatched during their era
Quote
Miles Commodore @miles_commodore
Were you a fan of these ladies?
https://x.com/EricIdle/status/2016229222050894275
FAFO Farms @FAFOFarmsTX - Anecdotally, when commercial herbicides & pesticides were introduced all of a sudden everyone in my family who worked their farm got non-hodgkin lymphoma. No history of cancer before that. Once they sold the farm because of their health & moved away, cancer in the family vanished... weird.
Quote
Beef Initiative BeefMaps.com @beefinitiative
MONSANTO LIED. PEOPLE DIED. NOW THEY WANT IMMUNITY.
The Supreme Court will decide FRIDAY whether to hear Bayer/Monsanto’s Roundup cancer case.
-
THE FIGHT IS NOT OVER! SHARE THIS NOW!
-
If they take it — and Bayer wins — pesticide manufacturers could get permanent immunity, even when their products cause cancer and their approvals were based on fraud.
-
Here’s the play:
- Bayer says the EPA didn’t require a cancer warning
- So they shouldn’t be liable for not including one
- Even though Roundup’s EPA approval was based on a ghostwritten, retracted study
- Even though Roundup causes non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
- And even though thousands were never warned
This case isn’t just about Roundup.
-
If SCOTUS grants review and rules in Bayer’s favor, it could set a precedent shielding over 57,000 pesticide products—and every future pesticide—from liability.
-
That means:
→ As long as a company “follows the label,” they’re immune.
→ Even if the label was based on fraud, manipulation, or ghostwritten junk science.
-
57,000+ pesticides. Zero accountability.
-
This isn’t just regulatory capture.
-
It’s a blueprint for legal immunity built on deception.
-
SCOTUS must DENY REVIEW.
-
We’ve got 48 hours to flood the zone.
-
Tag everyone. Share the retracted study.
-
Let DC know:
-
NO IMMUNITY FOR POISON.
NO JUSTICE FOR FRAUD.
-
@amtoxicology @RobSchneider
https://x.com/FAFOFarmsTX/status/2016247236561404209
Fox News @FoxNews - Video: HOME TURF: Marine One is wheels down on the South Lawn of the White House.
https://x.com/FoxNews/status/2016339586637525167
Fox News @FoxNews - Video: NEW ANGLE: A man sitting in the front row of Rep. Ilhan Omar's town hall was tackled after he appeared to spray her with an unknown substance.
https://x.com/FoxNews/status/2016332955577192690
Glenn Beck @glennbeck - Video: I don’t think Trump is “retreating” from Minnesota. I think he just told Walz and Frey, “CHECKMATE.”
-
Think about it: Minnesota’s Democratic leadership wanted Trump to either invoke the Insurrection Act (so they can scream, “military occupation!”) or fully retreat (and prove to other radicals they can win).
-
Instead, Trump said he’s open to trading less ICE presence in Minneapolis for more state cooperation on deporting dangerous criminal illegals. Remember, THAT was his goal all along: to remove the worst of the worst.
-
So, Walz and Frey have a choice now: give Trump what he really wanted or tell citizens to keep actual murderers and rapists in their communities. Either way, Trump wins.
https://x.com/glennbeck/status/2016233834979676163
9