>>/173827/,  >>/173828/,  >>/173829/,  >>/173830/,  >>/173831/,  >>/173832/,  >>/173833/,  >>/173834/,  >>/173835/,  >>/173836/,  >>/173837/,  >>/173838/,  >>/173839/,  >>/173840/,  >>/173841/,  >>/173842/,  >>/173843/,  >>/173844/,  >>/173845/,  >>/173846/,  >>/173847/,  >>/173848/,  >>/173849/,  >>/173850/
Iran Spectator @IranSpec -  𝐅𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 
| In a few hours, the final "strike options" briefing is presented to Trump, here is my analysis of what will happen:
𝐍𝐨 𝐇𝐚𝐥𝐟-𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐬: 
A low-impact, symbolic strike is OFF the table, the U.S will not risk looking weak, the media will see protests being crushed the next day by the IRGC-Basij if it’s not big enough + will give them an excuse to crack down harder on protesters.
The U.S. is aiming for a medium-OR-high-damage operation, with the secondary goal of limiting Iran's ability to retaliate.
𝐎𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐀 (𝐌𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐮𝐦 𝐈𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐭): 
Paralyzing the IRGC/Basij and assassinating top generals. This aims to cripple the regime’s internal control and spark revolution while keeping retaliation manageable.
𝐎𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐁 (𝐇𝐢𝐠𝐡 𝐈𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐭): 
A massive decapitation strike. Destroying 60–70% of ballistic missile capabilities, air defenses, and IRGC command hubs (Tharallah HQ) to eliminate the threat entirely.
- Contrary to popular belief, No, they won’t need aircraft carriers, even for option B.
——————————————
-  𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝟓𝟎/𝟓𝟎 𝐒𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐭:
It is a coin toss. Option A is strategic but risks U.S. lives in an Iranian retaliation, especially with no aircraft carriers; Option B is a total reset but carries the "Artesh wildcard." Explained below
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐞𝐬𝐡 𝐖𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐝:
If Option B is chosen, the fate of the country rests with the Artesh (Regular Army). 
Will they take control and side with the people, or join the IRGC in a suicidal retaliation + mass genocide to kill the revolution? 
If the Artesh choose the latter, it will be absolute chaos.
https://x.com/IranSpec/status/2011053161445015836

Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec - Massive SCOOP by Human Events!
Quote
Human Events Daily @humaneventslive
Treasury Sec Scott Bessent Interview: Anti-ICE Group Funding Is Under Investigation
Podcast: 
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/human-events-daily-with-jack-posobiec/id1585243541?i=1000744884319
Rumble: 
https://rumble.com/v747zxm-human-events-daily-with-jack-posobiec.html
https://x.com/JackPosobiec/status/2010896123381342676

James Comer @RepJamesComer - Video: DOZENS OF WHISTLEBLOWERS are now sounding the alarm to @GOPoversight on rampant taxpayer fraud in Minnesota.
Governor Tim Walz made a deliberate effort to keep them silent.
We must expose this theft of taxpayer dollars & hold everybody accountable who let it happen. @FoxNews
https://x.com/RepJamesComer/status/2010732919296577610

James Spann @spann - TUESDAY MORNING UPDATE: This is the probability of 1" of snow or greater through January 23 (from the reliable European ensemble output, AI version).
In Alabama the chance remains zero. We might see a few flurries tomorrow night, or Friday night/Saturday morning. No impact, no accumulation.
Yet within the past week you have been flooded with forecasts of big snows with major impact across the Deep South from garbage engagement farms on social platforms. It is unfortunate that some actual meteorologists have gotten into this game.
There’s real harm in this—and it’s not just “weather geek drama.” Posting long-range deterministic snow maps (10–20 days out) as if they’re meaningful forecasts causes predictability, trust, and behavior problems.
Here’s the breakdown.
*It teaches people to misunderstand how forecasting works
At 10–16 days, deterministic detail is essentially noise.
The atmosphere is chaotic
Small upstream errors explode with time
 25