>>/172795/, >>/172796/, >>/172797/, >>/172798/, >>/172799/, >>/172800/, >>/172801/, >>/172802/, >>/172803/, >>/172804/, >>/172805/, >>/172806/, >>/172807/, >>/172808/, >>/172809/, >>/172810/, >>/172811/, >>/172812/, >>/172813/, >>/172814/, >>/172815/, >>/172816/, >>/172817/, >>/172818/, >>/172819/, >>/172820/, >>/172821/, >>/172822/, >>/172823/, >>/172824/, >>/172825/, >>/172826/, >>/172827/, >>/172828/, >>/172829/, >>/172830/, >>/172831/, >>/172832/, >>/172833/, >>/172834/, >>/172835/, >>/172836/, >>/172837/, >>/172838/, >>/172839/, >>/172840/, >>/172841/, >>/172842/, >>/172843/, >>/172844/, >>/172845/, >>/172846/, >>/172847/, >>/172848/, >>/172849/, >>/172850/, >>/172851/, >>/172852/, >>/172853/, >>/172854/, >>/172855/, >>/172856/, >>/172857/, >>/172858/, >>/172859/, >>/172860/, >>/172861/, >>/172862/, >>/172863/, >>/172864/, >>/172865/, >>/172866/, >>/172867/, >>/172868/, >>/172869/, >>/172870/, >>/172871/, >>/172872/, >>/172873/, >>/172874/, >>/172875/, >>/172876/, >>/172877/, >>/172878/, >>/172879/, >>/172880/, >>/172881/, >>/172882/, >>/172883/, >>/172884/, >>/172885/, >>/172886/, >>/172887/, >>/172888/, >>/172889/, >>/172890/, >>/172891/, >>/172892/, >>/172893/, >>/172894/, >>/172895/, >>/172896/, >>/172897/, >>/172898/, >>/172899/, >>/172900/, >>/172901/, >>/172902/, >>/172903/, >>/172904/, >>/172905/, >>/172906/, >>/172907/, >>/172908/, >>/172909/, >>/172910/, >>/172911/, >>/172912/, >>/172913/, >>/172914/, >>/172915/, >>/172916/, >>/172917/, >>/172918/, >>/172919/, >>/172920/, >>/172921/, >>/172922/, >>/172923/, >>/172924/, >>/172925/, >>/172926/, >>/172927/, >>/172928/, >>/172929/, >>/172930/, >>/172931/, >>/172932/
-
Representative Niska.
-
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. The Attorney General was asked in those recordings to use his authority to protect businesses under investigation for wrongdoing, and rather than distance himself or remain neutral to allow the legal process to unfold, he responded in those recordings, "of course - I'm here to help."
-
Mr. Speaker, point of parliamentary inquiry.
-
State your point of parliamentary inquiry.
-
Mr. Speaker, there was a point of order, and I didn't hear a ruling or any resolution of the point of order. Was there a resolution to it?
-
I'll remind the body that there was no ruling made by the Speaker as to the point of order that was just stated.
Representative Niska.
-
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
The Attorney General in those recordings even urged the individuals, "let's go fight these people."
He was offered campaign contributions during that meeting - contributions that he later accepted.
The release of those audio recordings raises questions about what's going on in the Attorney General's office that go directly to the need to pass the legislation that we had previously debated, House File 20.
Although he has insisted that nothing came of the meeting, his office locked disclosure of closed investigative data.
-
State your point of order.
-
Mason's 124.
-
The A-11 will help ensure that what happens behind closed doors in the Attorney General's office sees the light of day.
We can protect people's privacy while shining a light on what the Attorney General's office is doing, who is influencing that office, whether it's those under a criminal investigation, nonprofits, corporations, or billionaires with political agendas, because Minnesotans have a right to know when their Attorney General's office is working with them.
Minnesotans have a right to know whether the Attorney General is telling the truth that nothing came of that meeting.
That's why the A-11 is so important.
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/115833500742771102
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump - Video: The SCIF @TheSCIF:
Exposing Arizona's ENORMOUS 2020 Election FRAUD Scandal. Forensic Evidence of 25,000+ counterfeit ballots. This is just ONE state. Imagine the entire country...
During the Arizona Senate Audit, two independent forensic experts exposed what could be one of the most egregious cases of election interference in recent history.
This report compiles irrefutable evidence pointing to over 25,000 counterfeit ballots inserted into the 2020 General Election—potentially tipping the scales and undermining the will of Arizona voters.
139