>>/172234/, >>/172235/, >>/172236/, >>/172237/, >>/172238/, >>/172239/, >>/172240/
BRYANTISM @BRYANTIANITY - Pepe Orchestra
https://x.com/BRYANTIANITY/status/2004588857522852031
bumbadum @bumbadum14 - Yes. A jury found a a Somalian guilty and the judge threw out the verdict.
https://x.com/bumbadum14/status/2005343284093473007
C3 @C_3C_3 - We can’t get Tina Peters out of prison and Kilmar Abrego Garcia out of America.
Not good.
https://x.com/C_3C_3/status/2003303896807276549
Candace Owens @RealCandaceO - Reposting with new information:
Totally agree with you on the below.
While I was never fully committing myself to rely on Mitch’s memory— the frankly bizarre misinformation campaign which now includes his ex-girlfriends, estranged sons, and periodic emotional breakdowns from Alex Jones leads me to believe we now need solid information on the whereabouts of all mentioned so we can move on. Here is where we are at:
Brian Harpole: ignored my texts. But submitted his irrelevant flights through Andrew Kolvet to a YouTuber. Mitch felt VERY certain he saw Brian Harpole exiting the top brass meeting around 7:30am.
Erika Kirk: For no reason at all, she submitted her irrelevant metadata via Andrew Kolvet to a YouTuber as proof of her whereabouts on the 9th which was never a topic of discussion. Mitch felt VERY certain he saw her on the 8th at a hotel on the base. Important to note: this sighting was NOT at the top brass meeting on the 9th. Could be entirely unrelated to the meeting.
Mark Amodei: shared an actually relevant link to his house committee stream on 9/9. He indeed misses the first two rolls calls and does not vote until 3pm BUT many people believe they see him on camera (BEFORE the roll calls begin) at 58 minute mark in the video. This appearance would make it impossible for him to have attended the meeting earlier in Arizona.
Cabot Philips: No response. Missing from his show from 9/4-9/10 but he very well may have just been on vacation somewhere that week and is choosing not to respond for his own reasons.
If you have any information about the above, please email [email protected]
Quote
Sam Parker @BasedSamParker
I don't know if Mitch is telling the truth or lying about Fort Huachuca. I don't know if Mitch is telling what he thinks is the truth, but is just misremembering or mistaken. I don't know if he's a psyop to discredit Candace and/or the broader investigation into the Charlie Kirk assassination
As a private citizen with limited bandwidth & investigative tools, there are only 3 ways I can think of to get to the truth for me:
1. Mitch recants:
▪️So far, Mitch has not recanted.
2. The accused prove Mitch wrong:
▪️So far, the accused have not proven him wrong (With the *possible* exception of Mark Amodei. But even 1 of 4 alleged doesn't falsify the other 3)
3. More facts or witnesses continue to come out that confirm one way or the other:
▪️So far, no evidence has been presented that falsifies the verifiable aspects of Mitch's claims, while other evidence has emerged that he was indeed on base. No other witnesses have come forward.
I'm keen to get to the truth one way or another, just as everyone else is. And just like everyone else, I'm basically a hostage to one or more of those 3 remedies. I don't like that, but it is what it is.
I'm not married to Fort Huachuca and my own investigation doesn't hinge on it one way or another. Fort Huachuca allegations being false or fake don't falsify other aspects and avenues of this investigation.
But it's either a massive distraction or a massive component. At this point, the whole thing has gotten so big, we need to know one way or the other. Can't be swept under the rug or ignored. And smear campaigns from either side are irrelevant. If Mitch is lying or mistaken, the quickest way to discredit him and put this to bed is for Brian Harpole, Erika Kirk, and Cabot Phillips to nuke him with verifiable receipts.
8