>>/171879/, >>/171880/, >>/171881/, >>/171882/, >>/171883/, >>/171884/, >>/171885/, >>/171886/, >>/171887/, >>/171888/, >>/171889/, >>/171890/, >>/171891/, >>/171892/, >>/171893/, >>/171894/, >>/171895/, >>/171896/, >>/171897/, >>/171898/, >>/171899/, >>/171900/, >>/171901/, >>/171902/, >>/171903/, >>/171904/, >>/171905/, >>/171906/, >>/171907/, >>/171908/, >>/171909/, >>/171910/, >>/171911/, >>/171912/, >>/171913/
Lara Logan @laralogan - The constitution grants every American citizen the right to redress of their grievances against the govt. Failure to uphold this right is a violation of the law.
Quote
Ann Vandersteel™ @annvandersteel
THE PEOPLE ARE TAKING THEIR RIGHTS BACK
The Constitution did not give prosecutors control over justice.
It gave that power to the People through the grand jury.
This week, a federal court is considering whether to dismiss a citizen petition that asks for one simple thing.
That the U.S. Attorney comply with federal law and inform a grand jury when citizens present evidence of alleged crimes.
Federal law is clear.
18 U.S.C. § 3332 states that when a citizen requests it, the U.S. Attorney shall inform the grand jury.
Shall does not mean may.
Yet across the country, citizens are being told they have no access to grand juries at all.
To understand how this happened, you have to look at 1946.
Before 1946, citizens could bring evidence directly to a grand jury. The grand jury functioned as an independent body, accountable to the People, not controlled by prosecutors or judges.
In 1946, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure were adopted. For the first time, prosecutors were inserted as compulsory gatekeepers between the People and the grand jury. Citizens were effectively barred from direct access, even though the Constitution itself was never amended.
That single procedural change shifted the balance of power away from the People and into the hands of the Executive Branch.
Congress later attempted to correct this imbalance by enacting 18 U.S.C. § 3332, which reaffirmed that when citizens present evidence and request it, the U.S. Attorney must inform the grand jury.
But today, that statutory safeguard is routinely ignored.
If prosecutors can permanently block citizens from grand juries, elections cannot be lawfully challenged because evidence never reaches independent citizens. Corruption cannot be independently investigated because prosecutors decide what the grand jury is allowed to hear. The Fifth Amendment becomes meaningless because the grand jury no longer functions as a constitutional check on government power.
At that point, accountability exists only if the government chooses it.
That is not how the Constitution was designed.
This case is not asking for indictments. It is not asking judges to decide guilt or innocence. It is about granting access to the people to bring evidence of a crime to a grand jury.
The Supreme Court has already held that the grand jury is not an arm of the prosecution or the judiciary. It is an independent institution rooted in the sovereignty of the People.
If citizens are denied access entirely, then a core constitutional safeguard has quietly disappeared without amendment, without debate, and without the consent of the governed.
This is the question before the country.
Do the People still have a constitutional voice through the grand jury, or has that voice been nullified through procedure and silence?
The answer will shape whether accountability is still possible in America.
Read that again.
cc: @GenFlynn @AGPamBondi @DAGToddBlanche @realDonaldTrump @votepalmbeach @PeaceMakerALDO
https://x.com/laralogan/status/2002819102046658978
Lara Logan @laralogan - The spiritual war is becoming a real war.
Nicaragua bans tourists from bringing Bibles into the country
https://www.christianpost.com/news/nicaragua-bans-tourists-from-bringing-bibles-into-the-country.html
https://x.com/laralogan/status/2002841968372568070
36