>>/169898/,  >>/169899/,  >>/169900/,  >>/169901/,  >>/169902/,  >>/169903/,  >>/169904/,  >>/169905/,  >>/169906/,  >>/169907/,  >>/169908/,  >>/169909/,  >>/169910/,  >>/169911/,  >>/169912/
Gregg Keller @RGreggKeller - .⁦@AGCHanaway⁩ ⁦@LtGovWasinger⁩ - this video is believed to be a ⁦@TargetingMicro⁩ employee outside a Missouri disabled veterans clinic menacing and threatening people today.
https://x.com/RGreggKeller/status/1993460972678180970

Greg Price @greg_price11 - If you want to know just how much Donald Trump saved the Republican Party, here is somebody who worked for McCain in '08, the RNC for Romney in '12, and was Jeb Bush's communications director in '16 who is now arguing to abolish ICE, abolish the second amendment, that blue cities are run better than red states, and that we have a Muslim ban in America because Trump banned travel from less than 8 Muslim countries.
Quote
Jubilee @jubileemedia
Tim Miller debates 20 Gen-Z Conservatives, this Wednesday on #surrounded @Timodc
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1993357534011207861

Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman - Oh look, another completely innocent “fisherman’s” boat that Democrats love to defend.
https://x.com/GuntherEagleman/status/1993357536108450297

Hans Mahncke @HansMahncke - Roger is right. The way this “judge” interpreted the 120 day rule produces an outcome that defies basic logic and collapses under its own absurdity. It is fundamentally irrational. This was not a judgment guided by reason and law but one driven by Trump hatred and a desire to protect deep state operatives.
But this should not detract from figuring out how things got to this point in the first place. This “judge” only got to have a say because someone on Team Trump chose to appoint and then protect a saboteur from the outset. There would have been no indictments at all and we would never have seen any of the smoking gun documents, including Comey’s handwritten Russiagate notes, had President Trump not stepped in, fired Erik Siebert, and appointed Lindsey Halligan instead.
What remains unexplained is why Siebert was appointed in the first place. There has been no accounting of who orchestrated that decision and shielded him once it became obvious he was sabotaging these cases. And until that is uncovered, the same people responsible will continue to be a problem.
Quote
Roger Stone @RogerJStoneJr
Today's ruling by a biased partisan Judge challenging the appointment of Lindsey Halligan is deeply flawed 
The court ruled that once the original 120-day § 546 period expired (May 21, 2025), the AG permanently lost the power to appoint interim U.S. Attorneys in that district.
That means:
•Halligan cannot legally be re-appointed as Interim U.S. Attorney by DOJ.
•Any attempt to re-issue a § 546 appointment would again be invalid.
•Only the district court can appoint the next interim U.S. Attorney.
Even though the AG is the ONLY person with removal power. The district court cannot remove. So if the district court put in a new US Attorney, the AG can immediately fire that person.
Wrong ! 
Must be appealed while House Republicans prepare a resolution to remove the Judge which they can do under
Article III Section 1
https://x.com/HansMahncke/status/1993123840860332300
 16